Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Colin Van Beem vs Stijn Slump Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Beem vs Slump analysis and find out who is favored!
Colin Van Beem vs Stijn Slump Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Beem 1 - 0 Slump
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Beem has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Slump has won 52.19%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Beem, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Slump has won 53.54%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 34.44% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Beem has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Slump has saved 64.22% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Beem has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Slump winning 65% (W/L 52/ 28) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Beem has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 60% (W/L 49/ 33), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 3). Slump has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 62% (W/L 72/ 45), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 52% (W/L 17/ 16).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Beem winning 1 times and Slump being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Beem winning 2 and Slump winning 1. The last match between Beem and Slump was at the Morocco F7, 02-11-2016, Second, Clay with Colin Van Beem getting the victory 4-6 7-6(5) 7-5.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 3:11:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Beem and Slump have played a deciding set 1 times, with Beem winning 1 times and Slump 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Beem winning 1, and Slump 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Beem has played against opponents with an average rank of while Slump has played against players with an average rank of 60.26.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Beem has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Slump has won 54% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Beem has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Slump has converted 49.55% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
Ret.
Rank
537
High
32
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
707
Rank
706
High
25
Age
R
Plays
W
W
L
W
W
W
W
L
W
L
Form
L
L
W
W
W
L
W
W
W
L
56% (191-153)
Career Total W/L
59% (89-62)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
71% (27-11)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
1
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Colin Van Beem | Stijn Slump |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 18 | 17 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 2 | 5 |
| Avg Match Time | 3:11:0 | 3:11:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 66% (78/119) | 79% (103/130) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 59% (46/78) | 55% (57/103) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 44% (18/41) | 37% (10/27) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 36% (8/22) | 57% (8/14) |
| Return Points W% | 48% (63/130) | 46% (55/119) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4-6 7-6(5) 7-5 |
Stats 
Colin Van Beem
Player
Stijn Slump
66%
(
78 of
119)
1st Serve %
79%
(
103 of
130)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
5
59%
(
46 of
78)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
57 of
103)
44%
(
18 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
36%
(
8 of
22)
Break Points Won
57%
(
8 of
14)
46%
(
55 of
119)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
63 of
130)
127
Total Points Won
122
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Colin Van Beem | Stijn Slump |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 71% (27/11) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 67% (60/30) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 58% (477/352) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 63% (5/3) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 73% (22/8) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0.27 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 109 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0.24 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 98 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:26:26 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 27.87 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 54% (1104/2030) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 70% (773/1104) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 52% (486/926) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 50% (107/216) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 42% (845/2001) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 71% (27/11) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 71% (27/38) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 45% (5/11) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 57% (8/14) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 79% (28/22) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 21% (28/6) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 50% (10/5) |
Colin Van Beem Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 |
Stats
Stefan Loncar
Player
Colin Van Beem
68%
(
49 of
72)
1st Serve %
60%
(
32 of
53)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
61%
(
30 of
49)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
40%
(
29 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
22 of
53)
65
Total Points Won
60
|
6-2 3-6 10-6 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Colin Van Beem
Player
Goran Radanovic
57%
(
45 of
79)
1st Serve %
58%
(
47 of
81)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
7
62%
(
28 of
45)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
29 of
47)
44%
(
15 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
46%
(
36 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
34 of
81)
77
Total Points Won
83
|
3-6 7-6(0) 10-7 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mircea-Alexandru Jecan
Player
Colin Van Beem
67%
(
45 of
67)
1st Serve %
56%
(
46 of
82)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
22 of
46)
41%
(
9 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
39%
(
26 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
39 of
82)
80
Total Points Won
69
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Colin Van Beem
Player
Patrik Rikl
56%
(
40 of
71)
1st Serve %
63%
(
57 of
91)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
80%
(
32 of
40)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
33 of
57)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
30%
(
21 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
38 of
91)
88
Total Points Won
74
|
3-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-1 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Fabian Marozsan
Player
Colin Van Beem
61%
(
37 of
61)
1st Serve %
47%
(
27 of
57)
3
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
17 of
27)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
10 of
30)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
34%
(
21 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
30 of
57)
70
Total Points Won
48
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Colin Van Beem
Player
Gokberk Ergeneman
56%
(
30 of
54)
1st Serve %
68%
(
43 of
63)
2
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
33%
(
18 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
33 of
63)
69
Total Points Won
48
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-4 6-2 | H2H | |||
view more
Stijn Slump Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F |
Stats
Michael Agwi
Player
Stijn Slump
66%
(
27 of
41)
1st Serve %
45%
(
19 of
42)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
11 of
19)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
32%
(
13 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
21 of
42)
49
Total Points Won
34
|
6-3 3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Stijn Slump
Player
Max Alcala Gurri
32%
(
24 of
75)
1st Serve %
70%
(
47 of
67)
6
Aces
3
9
Double Faults
5
83%
(
20 of
24)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
25 of
47)
41%
(
21 of
51)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
45%
(
34 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
36 of
67)
77
Total Points Won
65
|
6-2 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| QF | w/o | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Stijn Slump
Player
Kuzey Cekirge
38%
(
23 of
60)
1st Serve %
65%
(
47 of
72)
3
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
3
74%
(
17 of
23)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
28 of
47)
59%
(
22 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
35%
(
21 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
33 of
72)
72
Total Points Won
60
|
6-2 1-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Stijn Slump
Player
Deney Wassermann
56%
(
57 of
101)
1st Serve %
50%
(
55 of
109)
2
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
11
63%
(
36 of
57)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
36 of
55)
50%
(
22 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
23 of
54)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
43%
(
43 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
50 of
109)
108
Total Points Won
102
|
7-5 6-7(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Yanaki Milev
Player
Stijn Slump
63%
(
50 of
79)
1st Serve %
47%
(
48 of
102)
5
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
5
78%
(
39 of
50)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
33 of
48)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
26 of
54)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
29%
(
23 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
43 of
102)
99
Total Points Won
82
|
5-7 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Stijn Slump
Player
Gian Marco Ortenzi
53%
(
27 of
51)
1st Serve %
75%
(
38 of
51)
10
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
2
93%
(
25 of
27)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
25 of
38)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
25%
(
13 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
23 of
51)
61
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Stijn Slump
Player
Jiri Barnat
35%
(
19 of
55)
1st Serve %
59%
(
37 of
63)
5
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
79%
(
15 of
19)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
72%
(
26 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
25%
(
14 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
22 of
63)
63
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Stijn Slump
Player
Marcel Zielinski
52%
(
15 of
29)
1st Serve %
67%
(
36 of
54)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
93%
(
14 of
15)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
17%
(
5 of
29)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
32 of
54)
56
Total Points Won
27
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kokoro Isomura
Player
Stijn Slump
67%
(
47 of
70)
1st Serve %
48%
(
34 of
71)
2
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
3
68%
(
32 of
47)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
23 of
34)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
15 of
37)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
4 of
4)
37%
(
26 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
33 of
71)
77
Total Points Won
64
|
3-6 6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Beem Vs Slump Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Beem are available here and Slump photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
